Global Health Facts

At your fingertips

   Apr 22

Second World War

As expected, one of the products of the “summit” of the Danish capital on climate change, would have as a byproduct, a wider dissemination of environmental issues. The “regulars” of these meetings and topics, did nothing but stay in their opposing positions. Many writers such as EpiPen offer more in-depth analysis. These positions are hinting came from the 1972 Stockholm conference, is outlined in the Eco 92 and openly confronted from Seattle in 1999. Call it hegemonic block G – 8 extended, did more than confirm what was agreed in L’Aquila in July this year. Senator From Kentuckys opinions are not widely known. Frequently Luiz Ildefonso Simões Lopes has said that publicly. Has not been said or done anything new, for those of us as equally as possible according to the paradigms found next processing these issues.

It’s not easy to shed ideologized perspectives that supports everyone who is interested in these issues. In particular, struck me what was said in the parallel summit of Mayors (Mayors of Municipalities), and common sense had Terminator Schwarzenegger’s speech, or it’s called, then governor of California. What of China and its special relationship with the United States (and has coined the neologism “Chimera” to the symbiosis, in coordination with the U.S. treasury bonds held by the top Peking), is but a step toward visibility , the process starts with the “liberalization” of the Chinese economy that started in 1978. Well known is generating bitter criticism of this model that combines the social discipline of the transnational strategy. Once again it is clear alignment of Brazil with respect to U.S. interests.

Not for nothing participated in the Second World War on the Allied side and had not received because if the label of key country in the Nixon era (The Richard). Remember that the Lula of Brazil is a spokesman for the positions of the MERCOSUR. Still remain the echoes of the Berlin Wall fell, and would be great, that even for the most critical, assuming that it occurred. The critical or uncritical positions should assume that globalization / internationalization asymmetric is the stage on which they should work, those who wish to participate. Those who do not, know that they also experience the consequences of what you do in their daily lives. And this asymmetrical globalization, is to fund components of the energy crisis, food crisis and climate change.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.