Darwinism

As I give are opinions, but in believing that Darwinism is a dogma because it is (like religion), I will not continue the discussion in any way. I will ask that you read the books of Darwin, his son Leonard, his cousin Galton, Fischer, Richard Dawkins and so on, and if you really seem scientifically precepts, then continue the discussion. Meanwhile, I will continue to deliver opinions on that LUCA is not tested on any site, or on that, especially in the case of bacteria, the kind of terminology remains rather poor, taking into account phenomena such as THG, transposition virus, transposons themselves so it is endorsed by many prestigious scientists such as (C. Woeser, Nature 445, 369 (25 January 2007) doi: 10.1038/445369a Published online 24 January 2007). – 150,244,125,116 (discussion) 12:05 23 October 2008 (UTC) Javier Hermosa
No, I was born. Do not you supplements mean that I have not digested my readings. I need not cite others who deliver judgments for myself, I can not remember all the books I wellness read, and articles. If you read “Biology’s Next Revolution” by Woeser Goldenfeld and read “Thus, we regard as regrettable the concatenation of evolution with Darwin’s name, because health care other modalities must be considered.” All species need not have a common origin, since it is not shown. But in addition, the formation of new species can not occur by natural selection, is what you are not health able to understand Darwin. How do you left wing to insects’ Why mutations ‘ What that said, we were going slowly queratinoides structures and brought them to the top the wind’ So due to competition and predation on continuous a prey species that should not have disappeared ‘Then it can not be gradual and therefore not change the point randomly producing new species … Because there is no chance … and less on skin care evolution. Emerged as such a diversity limit after KT ‘at 6 million years showed a greater diversity than in the previous 100. As body explained by ‘Random’ No one will have little more to do with changes in the agenda packet and embryonic Hox genes’ Do not be that in times of environmental stress and produce more species truly evolutionary change ‘
There is a differential survival, fitness implying that health only those beneficial mutations prevail, those that let you play faster and faster in some … then those who are slow ‘in 3000 millions of years should not have gone’ I told you about the Biston, you’ve given much food for thought … and do not plants or a minimum what I’m saying ‘And then you have the nerve to tell me that seems a gesture of adolescent rebellion against a father’ What father ‘Of course it is reasoned and mature, what happens is that it is easier to acclimatize , Bend your head and say that if the wise and the righteous (as Nietzsche said), to work in a university teaching or any articulito able cardiovascular to publish, although the findings appear to extract more favorable towards the effective and cooperative interaction to the fierce competitiveness and stupid to the scientific base that gives our current biology (I quote the example of the article by Jordi nutrients Bascompte and Pedro Jordano in Scientific American September 2008 “Networks of mutualistic species) giving some fitness reason to be a system Economy wrong. – 80.39.210.152 (talk) 22:17 17 Jan 2009 (UTC) Javier Hermosa
Soy Javier Hermosa, just under a pseudonym. I think if you come from Madrid, one day we can meet to discuss this issue calmly and in a more direct and personal as good scientists.